Posts Tagged ‘performance practice’

Cleaning Out the Garage

Cleaning Out the Garage

summer is here and i’m actually think it might be productive. it’s not like i don’t need the break, i’m just not that productive when i don’t have any real structure to my day. overall the last few years have been a little too much drama for me and it’s time to “get my house in order” (literally as well as figuratively).

1st up is cleaning out my garage and turning it into a rehearsal studio/performance space. over the last few years i have definitely outgrown my “office” and now that i’m teaching private students at the house i need a bigger space to work in. after editing and mixing three albums (not to mention most of the composing that i do at home)i also have to admit that i really need a change of scenery. even though i wasn’t writing that much music this past year i found it very hard to want to sit down at my desk to do anything creative so i ventured out anywhere i could think of as an alternative creative space (including different rooms in the house) and came to the conclusion that having a larger space in my garage should do the trick for now. it will also allow me to setup and properly practice with the all the gear i’m using with my “music for controllers” setup. instead making music through headphones i really have needed to spend the time figuring out how to play these pieces “live” and have come to realize it’s much more involved than when I just played trombone.

the main problem is getting a proper balance when you are mixing live acoustic instruments (trombone, voice) and controllers (kaossilator, drone/scruti box, buddha machine, ableton live, launchpad, etc…). i also have realized that mixing electric and acoustic instruments without sound reinforcement can be very a very disjointed listening experience in a live performance and in many ways my even though much of this music is not technically hard to perform my “practicing” centers around how to setup gear, mics, and amps which means that i have to pretty much be practicing/performing with a stereo/PA system to make my performances aurally make sense.

with all that being said (and after trying to mostly “practice” at other locations) the reality is that the setup and teardown of this technological spectacle (a few amps, mic/stand, laptop/keyboard stand/table, MOTU traveller(digital/audio interface), and 2 pedal boards) can take almost as long as the rehearsal so for the time being i’m going to be only performing solo or with whomever musicians that can make it to the 90042 for a weekly rehearsal.

after driving down to fullerton and back for the last 20 years for PBE and DIE rehearsals can really take it’s toll and at this point in my life i think it’s only natural to change things up and make music in a different way. to me it’s kinda funny b/c on one hand i know there are a lot of people who over the past few years have been introduced to my “Retrace Our Steps/PBE 1.0″ music who really wish i was making more music with the larger group and really like the strings/winds/rock band orchestration. there are also another group who have only seen the “PBE 2.0 rock band” (as we jokingly called it) and keep asking when that group is going to perform again.  all i can say is that part of making alt-classical music is not really having the control to make those choices which leaves me to make music with the equipment and musicians that are available (and not continually banging my trying to fit a round peg in a square hole)

the good news is that if all goes well I should be performing on a regular basis soon. when and if there will be a PBE 3.0 is yet to be seen.  right now one step at a time is fine with me.


making the simple more complex?

making the simple more complex?

I’m starting to think we should teach theory by performance practice. pieces by bach, beethoven, and handel can be so different that without context these pieces can be incompressible to most students.

pedagogically most theory textbooks are organized by teaching students the skills to analyze basic harmony in a sequential manner. first we teach students how to identify and create the fundamentals; scales, intervals, chords, and non-harmonic tones, and then things get pretty tricky when many books start to wade into the deeper waters of counterpoint (via 4-part writing which has major pedagogical limitations and is a whole other post) and harmonic analysis in which we get to the crux of some major problems.

after the fundamentals are mastered, treating harmonic analysis and part writing as music theory are like treating phonics and sentence structure as reading. further separating the elements of music into different classes (like form and analysis and orchestration) make it pretty hard to give the students the big picture needed to make sense of the music they are playing (and later teaching and conducting)
after the fundamentals are mastered, another option would be to focus on teaching full works, which brings up even more problems like how do you give your students enough skills so they can open a score and understand the western canon of art music?
i’m also not going to say all the music theory textbooks are bad, but i think we are doing are students a huge disservice by using mostly short excerpts as primary our source material.  even with the best if intentions the main strategy of each chapter use brief musical example with easily identifiable answers of the concepts being taught which leads to the students inability to make sense of the same concept when it presented in a full score (especially if it isn’t as clearly delineated) .
for the past couple of years this has been my struggle while teaching lower division theory. i have looked at lots of textbooks, read michael rodgers great book on the subject; and had some pretty interesting conversations with other composers/teachers who share my frustration and are trying something new.
i guess right now i’m struggling with the ‘bigger picture’ questions like:
  • is it possible to learn it all? (western canon of art music)
  • if not what should we study?
  • the ‘best’ pieces?
  • the most commonly performed? and what do we leave out?

no matter which pieces we decide to study i really think the sooner we can start looking at music from the it’s elements (form, melody, harmony, rhythm, timbre) the more relevant our teaching will be of the skills needed to decode and perform music.

at the end of the day we need to find better ways to make the complex more simple instead of the simple more complex


Do You Realize?

Do You Realize?

Armando Bayolo posted interesting question at Sequenza 21 about composing and and the implications of performance practice with computers

“It made me wonder, also: are such views prevalent among any composers working today?  Are any of you fellow composers out there dissatisfied with the level of performance available to you (or perhaps it is simply the unavailability of performance outlets) and thus driven toward electroacoustic composition not for the compositional possibilities and expanded palette such electronic tools present but because, quite simply, electronic realization is the best performance you dream about?”

via Sequenza 21 “where to turn and why”